Nerman Fatic vs Goncalo Oliveira — Manama CH Round of 32

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1417Hard ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
VEN
Goncalo Oliveira
31 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWWWLL
Fatic N.
7-6 7-6
Oliveira G.
Fatic N.
77772
Oliveira G.
63650

Nerman Fatic defeated Goncalo Oliveira 7-6 7-6 in the Manama CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fatic N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Oliveira G.

Oliveira G.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fatic N.Oliveira G.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
4.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (92 vs 47). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fatic N.Oliveira G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
24
0
Break points saved·Even
63
64
Break points won·Dominant
36
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
1
Tiebreaks·Dominant
35
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fatic N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Oliveira G.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.5
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kukushkin M.
Gasquet R.[5]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Gasquet R.[5]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-37-64
Kukushkin M.
Mensik J.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mensik J.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-32-1
Kukushkin M.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[5]
Harris B.
5-76-16-2
R16
Mensik J.[4]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rincon D.
Lokoli L.
3-66-16-4
Harris B.
Elias G.
6-26-2
Gasquet R.[5]
Buldorini P.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Andreev A.
6-06-1
Trungelliti M.
Dougaz A.
7-56-757-5
Kukushkin M.
Ritschard A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Fognini F.[2]
3-67-656-0
R32
Rincon D.
Durasovic V.
6-41-67-5
Buldorini P.
Peniston R.
2-4
Harris B.
Oconnell C.[1]
7-660-0
Fatic N.
Oliveira G.
7-637-65
Trungelliti M.
Klein L.[6]
6-43-66-3
Mensik J.[4]
Basilashvili N.
6-36-4
Kukushkin M.
Svrcina D.
6-26-2
Lokoli L.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Ilkel C.
3-66-17-66
Gasquet R.[5]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Virtanen O.
6-16-2
Dougaz A.
Molleker R.
6-36-1
Ritschard A.
Ymer E.[8]
6-26-4
Shelbayh A.
Kovalik J.
7-646-3
Fognini F.[2]
Qaed Y.
6-16-1