Jules Marie vs Antoine Escoffier — Cherbourg CH Round of 32

Cherbourg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA
Jules Marie
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
FRA8
Antoine Escoffier
#581ATP
1436ELO
1413Hard ELO
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Marie J.
6-7 6-2 6-0
Escoffier A.
Marie J.
66662
Escoffier A.
78201

Jules Marie defeated Antoine Escoffier 6-7 6-2 6-0 in the Cherbourg CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Antoine Escoffier came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Marie J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Escoffier A.

Escoffier A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Marie J.

Serve advantage — Escoffier A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Marie J.Escoffier A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (44 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Marie J.Escoffier A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
28
10
Break points saved·Even
68
68
Break points won·Even
19
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
49
11
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
24
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Marie J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Escoffier A.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
2.8
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
6.1
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martineau M.
Geerts M.
7-56-4
Piros Z.[4]
Halys Q.[2]
7-656-3
Quarter-finals
Geerts M.
Lajal M.
6-16-3
Piros Z.[4]
Vylegzhanin N.
6-44-66-4
Martineau M.
Kachmazov A.
6-26-4
Halys Q.[2]
Droguet T.[5]
7-54-66-3
R16
Geerts M.
Nakashima B.[1]
6-46-4
Lajal M.
Poullain L.
7-656-1
Halys Q.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-63
Piros Z.[4]
Bellucci M.
6-37-5
Martineau M.
Paire B.[3]
6-16-4
Kachmazov A.
Lamasine T.
6-36-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Marie J.
1-66-36-2
Droguet T.[5]
Berankis R.
6-26-3
R32
Nakashima B.[1]
Royer V.
6-46-4
Kachmazov A.
Gadamauri B.
7-52-66-2
Paire B.[3]
Mpetshi Perricard G.
7-56-4
Vylegzhanin N.
Damm M.
7-646-1
Halys Q.[2]
Galarneau A.
6-46-4
Piros Z.[4]
Rottoli L.
6-16-2
Geerts M.
Otte O.
6-756-36-4
Poullain L.
Copil M.
6-36-4
Lajal M.
Gautier A.
6-36-3
Martineau M.
Malige M.
6-23-66-1
Lamasine T.
Choinski J.[6]
6-43-67-63
Marie J.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-766-26-0
Bellucci M.
Giustino L.
7-616-3
Droguet T.[5]
Trotter J.
7-656-4
Berankis R.
Squire H.
6-34-67-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.
6-46-2