Gastao Elias vs Cem Ilkel — Manama CH Round of 32

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gastao Elias
POR
Gastao Elias
#728ATP
1447ELO
1419Hard ELO
35 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
Cem Ilkel
TUR
Cem Ilkel
#1462ATP
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Elias G.
3-6 6-1 7-6
Ilkel C.
Elias G.
36782
Ilkel C.
61661

Gastao Elias defeated Cem Ilkel 3-6 6-1 7-6 in the Manama CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Elias G.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ilkel C.

Ilkel C.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Elias G.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Elias G.Ilkel C.
1st serve in·Even
54%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
4.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (87 vs 35). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Elias G.Ilkel C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
37
32
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
49
Break points won·Clear edge
24
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
86
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Elias G.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 35 days (−0.7)
Ilkel C.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.4
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Kukushkin M.
Gasquet R.[5]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Gasquet R.[5]
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-37-64
Kukushkin M.
Mensik J.[4]
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Mensik J.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-32-1
Kukushkin M.
Shelbayh A.
6-46-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Gasquet R.[5]
Harris B.
5-76-16-2
R16
Mensik J.[4]
Fatic N.
6-16-4
Rincon D.
Lokoli L.
3-66-16-4
Harris B.
Elias G.
6-26-2
Gasquet R.[5]
Buldorini P.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.[7]
Andreev A.
6-06-1
Trungelliti M.
Dougaz A.
7-56-757-5
Kukushkin M.
Ritschard A.
6-46-4
Shelbayh A.
Fognini F.[2]
3-67-656-0
R32
Rincon D.
Durasovic V.
6-41-67-5
Buldorini P.
Peniston R.
2-4
Harris B.
Oconnell C.[1]
7-660-0
Fatic N.
Oliveira G.
7-637-65
Trungelliti M.
Klein L.[6]
6-43-66-3
Mensik J.[4]
Basilashvili N.
6-36-4
Kukushkin M.
Svrcina D.
6-26-2
Lokoli L.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-16-4
Dzumhur D.[7]
Giannessi A.
6-36-1
Elias G.
Ilkel C.
3-66-17-66
Gasquet R.[5]
Huesler M.
6-36-4
Andreev A.
Virtanen O.
6-16-2
Dougaz A.
Molleker R.
6-36-1
Ritschard A.
Ymer E.[8]
6-26-4
Shelbayh A.
Kovalik J.
7-646-3
Fognini F.[2]
Qaed Y.
6-16-1