Elmar Ejupovic vs Stuart Parker — Glasgow CH Quarter-final

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
—
Sets
Walkover
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
GBR
Stuart Parker
#766ATP
1434ELO
1412Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWWLWLW
Ejupovic E.
vs
Parker S.

Elmar Ejupovic advanced past Stuart Parker via walkover in the Glasgow CH quarter-final.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ejupovic E.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Parker S.

Parker S.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ejupovic E.Parker S.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.3
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (39 vs 54). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ejupovic E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Parker S.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 224 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.
Jubb P.
0-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Chidekh C.
Guinard M.[4]
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Ejupovic E.
4-67-636-3
Quarter-finals
Ejupovic E.
Parker S.
W/O
Jubb P.
Searle H.
6-44-66-2
Guinard M.[4]
Kuhn N.
7-646-3
Chidekh C.
Stewart H.
4-66-46-4
R16
Parker S.
Edmund K.
7-647-65
Guinard M.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Robertson C.
6-26-2
Ejupovic E.
Broom C.[8]
6-46-3
Stewart H.
Strombachs R.
1-67-56-1
Chidekh C.
Taberner C.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Diez S.[6]
6-36-1
Searle H.
Cox D.
6-46-4
R32
Guinard M.[4]
Blockx A.
6-15-74-1
Robertson C.
Colson T.
6-47-63
Edmund K.
Kuzmanov D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Searle H.
Vesely J.[5]
7-656-4
Cox D.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Diez S.[6]
Oliel Y.
6-45-77-65
Chidekh C.
Zuk K.
7-56-2
Gerasimov E.
Safwat M.
6-17-62
Stewart H.
Hemery C.[1]
6-46-4
Strombachs R.
Matusevich A.
7-636-1
Taberner C.
Jorda Sanchis D.[7]
5-77-646-4
Kuhn N.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-3
Jubb P.
Maestrelli F.
6-45-76-3
Broom C.[8]
Mchugh A.
4-66-27-65
Ejupovic E.
Lock B.
7-56-4
Parker S.
Peliwo F.
6-46-3