Elmar Ejupovic vs Benjamin Lock — Glasgow CH Round of 32

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
ZIM
Benjamin Lock
33 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Ejupovic E.
7-5 6-4
Lock B.
Ejupovic E.
762
Lock B.
540

Elmar Ejupovic defeated Benjamin Lock 7-5 6-4 in the Glasgow CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ejupovic E.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Lock B.

Lock B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ejupovic E.Lock B.
1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Even
33%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
70%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.3
4.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ejupovic E.Lock B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
7
0
Break points saved·Dominant
87
46
Break points won·Even
1
0
Deciding sets·Even
0
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
45

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ejupovic E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lock B.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
1.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.
Jubb P.
0-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Chidekh C.
Guinard M.[4]
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Ejupovic E.
4-67-636-3
Quarter-finals
Ejupovic E.
Parker S.
W/O
Jubb P.
Searle H.
6-44-66-2
Guinard M.[4]
Kuhn N.
7-646-3
Chidekh C.
Stewart H.
4-66-46-4
R16
Parker S.
Edmund K.
7-647-65
Guinard M.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Robertson C.
6-26-2
Ejupovic E.
Broom C.[8]
6-46-3
Stewart H.
Strombachs R.
1-67-56-1
Chidekh C.
Taberner C.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Diez S.[6]
6-36-1
Searle H.
Cox D.
6-46-4
R32
Guinard M.[4]
Blockx A.
6-15-74-1
Robertson C.
Colson T.
6-47-63
Edmund K.
Kuzmanov D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Searle H.
Vesely J.[5]
7-656-4
Cox D.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Diez S.[6]
Oliel Y.
6-45-77-65
Chidekh C.
Zuk K.
7-56-2
Gerasimov E.
Safwat M.
6-17-62
Stewart H.
Hemery C.[1]
6-46-4
Strombachs R.
Matusevich A.
7-636-1
Taberner C.
Jorda Sanchis D.[7]
5-77-646-4
Kuhn N.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-3
Jubb P.
Maestrelli F.
6-45-76-3
Broom C.[8]
Mchugh A.
4-66-27-65
Ejupovic E.
Lock B.
7-56-4
Parker S.
Peliwo F.
6-46-3