Clement Chidekh vs Carlos Taberner — Glasgow CH Round of 16

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
FRA
Clement Chidekh
#207ATP
1513ELO
1523Hard ELO
$92kYTD
$401kCAREER
25 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1445Hard ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
Chidekh C.
6-4 6-2
Taberner C.
Chidekh C.
662
Taberner C.
420

Clement Chidekh defeated Carlos Taberner 6-4 6-2 in the Glasgow CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chidekh C.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Taberner C.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Chidekh C.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chidekh C.Taberner C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
43%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.9
1.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chidekh C.Taberner C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
74
Break points won·Dominant
9
59
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
75
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
12
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Chidekh C.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Taberner C.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+78 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Hard Elo 1445
4.6Overall Elo 1513
ELO gap
5.4Overall Elo 1610
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
4.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
8.9
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Chidekh C.Taberner C.
Freshness·
66
—

Chidekh C.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.
Jubb P.
0-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Chidekh C.
Guinard M.[4]
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Ejupovic E.
4-67-636-3
Quarter-finals
Ejupovic E.
Parker S.
W/O
Jubb P.
Searle H.
6-44-66-2
Guinard M.[4]
Kuhn N.
7-646-3
Chidekh C.
Stewart H.
4-66-46-4
R16
Parker S.
Edmund K.
7-647-65
Guinard M.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Robertson C.
6-26-2
Ejupovic E.
Broom C.[8]
6-46-3
Stewart H.
Strombachs R.
1-67-56-1
Chidekh C.
Taberner C.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Diez S.[6]
6-36-1
Searle H.
Cox D.
6-46-4
R32
Guinard M.[4]
Blockx A.
6-15-74-1
Robertson C.
Colson T.
6-47-63
Edmund K.
Kuzmanov D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Searle H.
Vesely J.[5]
7-656-4
Cox D.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Diez S.[6]
Oliel Y.
6-45-77-65
Chidekh C.
Zuk K.
7-56-2
Gerasimov E.
Safwat M.
6-17-62
Stewart H.
Hemery C.[1]
6-46-4
Strombachs R.
Matusevich A.
7-636-1
Taberner C.
Jorda Sanchis D.[7]
5-77-646-4
Kuhn N.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-3
Jubb P.
Maestrelli F.
6-45-76-3
Broom C.[8]
Mchugh A.
4-66-27-65
Ejupovic E.
Lock B.
7-56-4
Parker S.
Peliwo F.
6-46-3