Salvatore Caruso vs Yanaki Milev — Manama CH Qualifying Round 1

Manama CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
ITA4
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
BUL
Yanaki Milev
#715ATP
22 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Caruso S.
3-6 6-3 6-2
Milev Y.
Caruso S.
3662
Milev Y.
6321

Salvatore Caruso defeated Yanaki Milev 3-6 6-3 6-2 in the Manama CH qualifying round 1 on hard. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Milev Y.

Milev Y.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Serve advantage — Caruso S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Milev Y.
1st serve in·Even
55%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
51%
55%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (11 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Caruso S.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Milev Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.3
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Q2
Buldorini P.
Caruso S.[4]
6-31-67-62
Andreev A.[1]
Haliak M.[10]
6-16-2
Ilkel C.[2]
Sharipov M.[9]
6-10-0
Lokoli L.[7]
Pichler D.
7-50-0
Elias G.[5]
Erel Y.[8]
1-67-657-5
Durasovic V.[12]
Kirkin E.[6]
7-626-3
Q1
Erel Y.[8]
Bar Biryukov P.
6-46-1
Lokoli L.[7]
Agafonov E.
6-26-1
Caruso S.[4]
Milev Y.
3-66-36-2
Ilkel C.[2]
Orlov V.
2-66-16-2
Buldorini P.
Dellavedova M.
2-66-16-2
Pichler D.
Michalski D.[3]
6-06-2
Andreev A.[1]
Marmousez L.
6-26-4
Haliak M.[10]
Popyrin A.
6-45-76-4
Sharipov M.[9]
Abdulnabi E.
6-06-2
Elias G.[5]
Nikolic M.
6-36-1
Kirkin E.[6]
Nesterov P.
6-26-3
Durasovic V.[12]
Habib A.
3-66-26-2