Elmar Ejupovic vs Charles Broom — Glasgow CH Round of 16

Glasgow CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Elmar Ejupovic
#752ATP
33 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 February 2024
hard
GBR8
Charles Broom
#283ATP
1409ELO
1396Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLLW
Ejupovic E.
6-4 6-3
Broom C.
Ejupovic E.
662
Broom C.
430

Elmar Ejupovic defeated Charles Broom 6-4 6-3 in the Glasgow CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ejupovic E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Broom C.

Broom C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ejupovic E.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ejupovic E.Broom C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
69%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
8.4
6.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.3
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 84). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ejupovic E.Broom C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
7
12
Break points saved·Dominant
88
56
Break points won·Even
1
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
0
42
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
3
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ejupovic E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Broom C.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
3.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.2
Minutes 14d
3.2
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Chidekh C.
Jubb P.
0-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Chidekh C.
Guinard M.[4]
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Ejupovic E.
4-67-636-3
Quarter-finals
Ejupovic E.
Parker S.
W/O
Jubb P.
Searle H.
6-44-66-2
Guinard M.[4]
Kuhn N.
7-646-3
Chidekh C.
Stewart H.
4-66-46-4
R16
Parker S.
Edmund K.
7-647-65
Guinard M.[4]
Gerasimov E.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Robertson C.
6-26-2
Ejupovic E.
Broom C.[8]
6-46-3
Stewart H.
Strombachs R.
1-67-56-1
Chidekh C.
Taberner C.
6-46-2
Kuhn N.
Diez S.[6]
6-36-1
Searle H.
Cox D.
6-46-4
R32
Guinard M.[4]
Blockx A.
6-15-74-1
Robertson C.
Colson T.
6-47-63
Edmund K.
Kuzmanov D.[2]
6-32-66-2
Searle H.
Vesely J.[5]
7-656-4
Cox D.
Kym J.
6-36-4
Diez S.[6]
Oliel Y.
6-45-77-65
Chidekh C.
Zuk K.
7-56-2
Gerasimov E.
Safwat M.
6-17-62
Stewart H.
Hemery C.[1]
6-46-4
Strombachs R.
Matusevich A.
7-636-1
Taberner C.
Jorda Sanchis D.[7]
5-77-646-4
Kuhn N.
Celikbilek A.
6-36-3
Jubb P.
Maestrelli F.
6-45-76-3
Broom C.[8]
Mchugh A.
4-66-27-65
Ejupovic E.
Lock B.
7-56-4
Parker S.
Peliwo F.
6-46-3