Li Tu vs Yusuke Takahashi — Burnie 2 CH Round of 16

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS3
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
Yusuke Takahashi
JPN
Yusuke Takahashi
#671ATP
1268ELO
1243Hard ELO
28 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLW
Tu L.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Takahashi Y.
Tu L.
6362
Takahashi Y.
4631

Li Tu defeated Yusuke Takahashi 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Burnie 2 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Li Tu closed it out in three sets, 6–4 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Takahashi Y.

Takahashi Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Takahashi Y.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 98). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Takahashi Y.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
0
Break points saved·Dominant
82
36
Break points won·Even
8
7
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
3
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
11

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Takahashi Y.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.0+228 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.0Hard Elo 1243
8.2Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
1.8Overall Elo 1268
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.0
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4