Adam Walton vs Dane Sweeny — Burnie 2 CH Final

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Adam Walton
AUS1
Adam Walton
#79ATP
1703ELO
1669Hard ELO
$499kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
AUS4
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Walton A.
6-2 7-6
Sweeny D.
Walton A.
6772
Sweeny D.
2640

Adam Walton defeated Dane Sweeny 6-2 7-6 in the Burnie 2 CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Adam Walton came in ranked #79.

Key context

  • Match story: Adam Walton closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Walton A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Sweeny D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Walton A.

Serve advantage — Walton A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Walton A.Sweeny D.
35
Serve
—
17
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Walton A.Sweeny D.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.2
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Walton A.Sweeny D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
45
Break points saved·Dominant
95
69
Break points won·Slight edge
20
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
68
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
70
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Walton A.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Sweeny D.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.6+225 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.4Hard Elo 1444
6.7Overall Elo 1703
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1460
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.0
Surface form
6.1
Fatigue & Travel
8.3
Minutes 14d
7.4
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Walton A.Sweeny D.
Freshness·Dominant
54
98

Walton A.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 122 games (7d) · Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4