Li Tu vs Stefanos Sakellaridis — Burnie 2 CH Round of 32

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS3
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
GRE
Stefanos Sakellaridis
#147ATP
1631ELO
1566Hard ELO
$125kYTD
$341kCAREER
21 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWW
Tu L.
6-3 6-3
Sakellaridis S.
Tu L.
662
Sakellaridis S.
330

Li Tu defeated Stefanos Sakellaridis 6-3 6-3 in the Burnie 2 CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Stefanos Sakellaridis came in ranked #147.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Sakellaridis S.

Sakellaridis S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Sakellaridis S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Even
6.8
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 94). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Sakellaridis S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
63
Break points won·Even
8
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
83
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Sakellaridis S.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.4Hard Elo 1471
Surface ELO
5.6+95 Hard Elo edge
4.4Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
5.6Overall Elo 1631
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
2.1
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.4
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Sakellaridis S.
Freshness·
—
100

Sakellaridis S.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4