Bernard Tomic vs Olaf Pieczkowski — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
POL
Olaf Pieczkowski
#625ATP
1338ELO
1331Hard ELO
22 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLWWL
Tomic B.
2-6 6-4 7-6
Pieczkowski O.
Tomic B.
26772
Pieczkowski O.
64621

Bernard Tomic defeated Olaf Pieczkowski 2-6 6-4 7-6 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tomic B.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Pieczkowski O.

Pieczkowski O.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tomic B.Pieczkowski O.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 43). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tomic B.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Pieczkowski O.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
6.7+110 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.3Hard Elo 1331
7.2Overall Elo 1475
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1338
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
5.7
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tomic B.Pieczkowski O.
Freshness·
84
—

Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[2]
Nardi L.[1]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[1]
Tseng C.
6-44-67-66
Nagal S.[2]
Svrcina D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-56-2
Nagal S.[2]
Palan D.
6-36-3
Nardi L.[1]
Napolitano S.[5]
6-43-66-0
Svrcina D.[3]
Mukund S.
6-766-26-4
R16
Napolitano S.[5]
Added D.
6-26-1
Palan D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-22-66-4
Nagal S.[2]
Fonio G.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Blanchet U.[4]
6-04-66-2
Nardi L.[1]
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Dalla Valle E.
Roca Batalla O.[6]
6-47-62
Mukund S.
Echargui M.
7-646-3
Svrcina D.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-20-66-2
R32
Added D.
Santillan A.
2-66-44-1
Nardi L.[1]
Vanshelboim E.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Wu T.
3-2
Mukund S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-34-67-5
Palan D.
Weber A.
6-16-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dougaz A.[7]
6-36-3
Dalla Valle E.
Zakharov A.
3-67-626-4
Nagal S.[2]
Dev S.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-32-66-2
Tomic B.
Pieczkowski O.
2-66-47-62
Napolitano S.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Blanchet U.[4]
Forejtek J.
6-33-67-65
Tseng C.
Basilashvili N.
6-46-4
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-636-2
Echargui M.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-756-27-5
Fonio G.
Janvier M.
6-43-67-5