Luca Nardi vs Bernard Tomic — Chennai CH Round of 16

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ITA1
Luca Nardi
#160ATP
1585ELO
1572Hard ELO
$213kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
22 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1441Hard ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Nardi L.
7-5 6-3
Tomic B.
Nardi L.
762
Tomic B.
530

Luca Nardi defeated Bernard Tomic 7-5 6-3 in the Chennai CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Luca Nardi came in ranked #160, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Nardi closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nardi L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Nardi L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nardi L.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (139 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nardi L.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
32
53
Break points saved·Even
92
92
Break points won·Slight edge
15
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
42
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nardi L.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+131 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Hard Elo 1441
6.4Overall Elo 1585
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nardi L.Tomic B.
Freshness·Slight edge
90
84

Nardi L.: 3 days rest · 1 match, 22 games (7d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[2]
Nardi L.[1]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[1]
Tseng C.
6-44-67-66
Nagal S.[2]
Svrcina D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-56-2
Nagal S.[2]
Palan D.
6-36-3
Nardi L.[1]
Napolitano S.[5]
6-43-66-0
Svrcina D.[3]
Mukund S.
6-766-26-4
R16
Napolitano S.[5]
Added D.
6-26-1
Palan D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-22-66-4
Nagal S.[2]
Fonio G.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Blanchet U.[4]
6-04-66-2
Nardi L.[1]
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Dalla Valle E.
Roca Batalla O.[6]
6-47-62
Mukund S.
Echargui M.
7-646-3
Svrcina D.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-20-66-2
R32
Added D.
Santillan A.
2-66-44-1
Nardi L.[1]
Vanshelboim E.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Wu T.
3-2
Mukund S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-34-67-5
Palan D.
Weber A.
6-16-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dougaz A.[7]
6-36-3
Dalla Valle E.
Zakharov A.
3-67-626-4
Nagal S.[2]
Dev S.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-32-66-2
Tomic B.
Pieczkowski O.
2-66-47-62
Napolitano S.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Blanchet U.[4]
Forejtek J.
6-33-67-65
Tseng C.
Basilashvili N.
6-46-4
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-636-2
Echargui M.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-756-27-5
Fonio G.
Janvier M.
6-43-67-5