Dane Sweeny vs James Mccabe — Burnie 2 CH Quarter-final

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
AUS4
Dane Sweeny
#122ATP
1460ELO
1444Hard ELO
$256kYTD
$861kCAREER
25 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
AUS7
James Mccabe
#242ATP
1532ELO
1481Hard ELO
23 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWLW
Sweeny D.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Mccabe J.
Sweeny D.
6262
Mccabe J.
1641

Dane Sweeny defeated James Mccabe 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Burnie 2 CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Dane Sweeny came in ranked #122.

Key context

  • Match story: Dane Sweeny came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sweeny D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Mccabe J.

Mccabe J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sweeny D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sweeny D.Mccabe J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
8.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (94 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sweeny D.Mccabe J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
37
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
85
Break points won·Even
11
9
Deciding sets·Even
68
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sweeny D.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Mccabe J.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5Hard Elo 1444
Surface ELO
4.5+38 Hard Elo edge
5.4Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
4.6Overall Elo 1532
4.6No prior meetings
H2H
5.4
6.1
Surface form
2.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
8.5
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sweeny D.Mccabe J.
Freshness·Even
98
95

Sweeny D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mccabe J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 19 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4