Tomas Machac vs Andy Murray — Marseille Round of 32

Marseille · ATP · Round of 32
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#49ATP
1866ELO
1829Hard ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
GBR
Andy Murray
39 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWW
Machac T.
7-5 6-4
Murray A.
Machac T.
762
Murray A.
540

Tomas Machac defeated Andy Murray 7-5 6-4 in the Marseille round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-03-18Miami MastersR32hardTomas Machac5-7 7-5 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Murray A.

Murray A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Machac T.Murray A.
30
Serve
—
25
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Murray A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
57%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (121 vs 19). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Murray A.
Clutch Rating·Even
90
92
Break points saved·Even
98
98
Break points won·Even
80
79
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
99
Tiebreaks·Even
97
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Murray A.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.0
Surface form
1.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
6.0
Country comfort
6.4
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
11°COvercast
Wind 17 km/hHumidity 54%
Final
Humbert U.[4]
Dimitrov G.[2]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Dimitrov G.[2]
Khachanov K.[3]
6-736-47-65
Humbert U.[4]
Hurkacz H.[1]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Hurkacz H.[1]
Machac T.
6-36-4
Humbert U.[4]
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
6-16-4
Khachanov K.[3]
Zhang Z.
6-46-1
Dimitrov G.[2]
Rinderknech A.
6-37-63
R16
Humbert U.[4]
Gaston H.
2-66-16-3
Hurkacz H.[1]
Shevchenko A.
6-16-4
Machac T.
Musetti L.[6]
6-36-2
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
6-46-4
Khachanov K.[3]
Bautista Agut R.
6-26-2
Dimitrov G.[2]
Korda S.
6-17-65
Rinderknech A.
Lehecka J.[8]
7-57-65
R32
Shevchenko A.
Bonzi B.
7-646-4
Machac T.
Murray A.
7-56-4
Bautista Agut R.
Gasquet R.
6-37-5
Rinderknech A.
Cressy M.
6-767-56-2
Musetti L.[6]
Marterer M.
6-46-2
Gaston H.
Shapovalov D.
7-51-66-3
Ruusuvuori E.
Van Assche L.
7-626-4
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Barrere G.
4-66-46-4
Auger Aliassime F.[7]
Halys Q.
6-27-5
Zhang Z.
Zeppieri G.
6-776-16-4
Lehecka J.[8]
Goffin D.
3-67-56-2
Korda S.
Grenier H.
6-32-67-63