Christian Langmo vs Taisei Ichikawa — Burnie 2 CH Round of 32

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
JPN
Taisei Ichikawa
#799ATP
25 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWWLL
Langmo C.
7-6 6-4
Ichikawa T.
Langmo C.
7762
Ichikawa T.
6540

Christian Langmo defeated Taisei Ichikawa 7-6 6-4 in the Burnie 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Langmo C.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ichikawa T.

Ichikawa T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Langmo C.Ichikawa T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
65%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
3.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (110 vs 28). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Langmo C.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ichikawa T.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
4.5
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
8.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Langmo C.Ichikawa T.
Freshness·
65
—

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4