Sumit Nagal vs Giovanni Fonio — Chennai CH Round of 16

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Sumit Nagal
IND2
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
ITA
Giovanni Fonio
#910ATP
1349ELO
1350Hard ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWL
Nagal S.
7-5 6-2
Fonio G.
Nagal S.
762
Fonio G.
520

Sumit Nagal defeated Giovanni Fonio 7-5 6-2 in the Chennai CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in ranked #241, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Fonio G.

Fonio G.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Fonio G.
1st serve in·Slight edge
70%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (145 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Fonio G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
6
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
63
Break points won·Clear edge
35
12
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Nagal S.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Fonio G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.2+126 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.8Hard Elo 1350
6.7Overall Elo 1543
ELO gap
3.3Overall Elo 1349
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
6.8
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Fonio G.
Freshness·
96
—

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[2]
Nardi L.[1]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[1]
Tseng C.
6-44-67-66
Nagal S.[2]
Svrcina D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-56-2
Nagal S.[2]
Palan D.
6-36-3
Nardi L.[1]
Napolitano S.[5]
6-43-66-0
Svrcina D.[3]
Mukund S.
6-766-26-4
R16
Napolitano S.[5]
Added D.
6-26-1
Palan D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-22-66-4
Nagal S.[2]
Fonio G.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Blanchet U.[4]
6-04-66-2
Nardi L.[1]
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Dalla Valle E.
Roca Batalla O.[6]
6-47-62
Mukund S.
Echargui M.
7-646-3
Svrcina D.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-20-66-2
R32
Added D.
Santillan A.
2-66-44-1
Nardi L.[1]
Vanshelboim E.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Wu T.
3-2
Mukund S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-34-67-5
Palan D.
Weber A.
6-16-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dougaz A.[7]
6-36-3
Dalla Valle E.
Zakharov A.
3-67-626-4
Nagal S.[2]
Dev S.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-32-66-2
Tomic B.
Pieczkowski O.
2-66-47-62
Napolitano S.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Blanchet U.[4]
Forejtek J.
6-33-67-65
Tseng C.
Basilashvili N.
6-46-4
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-636-2
Echargui M.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-756-27-5
Fonio G.
Janvier M.
6-43-67-5