Philip Sekulic vs Maxime Chazal — Burnie 2 CH Round of 32

Burnie 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS8
Philip Sekulic
#317ATP
1390ELO
1363Hard ELO
22 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
FRA
Maxime Chazal
#469ATP
1294ELO
1241Hard ELO
33 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
Sekulic P.
6-3 6-4
Chazal M.
Sekulic P.
662
Chazal M.
340

Philip Sekulic defeated Maxime Chazal 6-3 6-4 in the Burnie 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sekulic P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Chazal M.

Chazal M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sekulic P.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sekulic P.Chazal M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (104 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sekulic P.Chazal M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
2
Break points saved·Dominant
79
40
Break points won·Clear edge
9
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
45
12
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
19
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sekulic P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Chazal M.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.9+123 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.1Hard Elo 1241
5.6Overall Elo 1390
ELO gap
4.4Overall Elo 1294
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.9
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
2.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Sekulic P.Chazal M.
Freshness·Clear edge
94
73

Sekulic P.: 9 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Chazal M.: 2 days rest · 1 match, 32 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Walton A.[1]
Sweeny D.[4]
6-27-64
Semi-finals
Sweeny D.[4]
Uchiyama Y.[6]
6-23-1
Walton A.[1]
Schoolkate T.[5]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Walton A.[1]
Sekulic P.[8]
6-21-67-62
Schoolkate T.[5]
Tu L.[3]
7-646-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Mccabe J.[7]
6-12-66-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Langmo C.
6-26-2
R16
Schoolkate T.[5]
Jasika O.
6-26-3
Langmo C.
Shimizu Y.[2]
6-37-61
Mccabe J.[7]
Saville L.
6-46-4
Walton A.[1]
Ilagan A.
6-26-736-3
Sekulic P.[8]
Moriya H.
6-46-3
Tu L.[3]
Takahashi Y.
6-43-66-3
Sweeny D.[4]
Ochi M.
6-34-66-2
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Hulme M.
3-66-36-4
R32
Saville L.
Lock B.
6-16-0
Ochi M.
Imamura M.
7-56-2
Tu L.[3]
Sakellaridis S.
6-36-3
Schoolkate T.[5]
Delaney J.
6-36-2
Takahashi Y.
Haliak M.
6-16-736-3
Hulme M.
Mochizuki Y.
6-37-64
Shimizu Y.[2]
Bolt A.
6-36-2
Jasika O.
Jones H.
6-37-63
Walton A.[1]
Bradshaw J.
7-56-3
Ilagan A.
Puttergill C.
6-43-66-3
Moriya H.
Dellavedova M.
6-26-0
Sekulic P.[8]
Chazal M.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.[7]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Sweeny D.[4]
Noguchi R.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.[6]
Kumasaka T.
6-06-2
Langmo C.
Ichikawa T.
7-656-4