Filip Peliwo vs Alexis Canter — Nottingham CH Qualifying Round 1

Nottingham CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
Filip Peliwo
POL11
Filip Peliwo
#509ATP
1234ELO
1281Grass ELO
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
grass
GBR
Alexis Canter
#1655ATP
28 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWL
Peliwo F.
7-6 6-4
Canter A.
Peliwo F.
7762
Canter A.
6240

Filip Peliwo defeated Alexis Canter 7-6 6-4 in the Nottingham CH qualifying round 1 on grass.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Peliwo F.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Canter A.

Canter A.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Peliwo F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peliwo F.Canter A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
71%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
43%
Service points won·Even
58%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Dominant
58%
25%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.0
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (41 vs 2). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Peliwo F.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 98 days (−1.5)
Canter A.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 2037 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.0
Surface transition
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q2
Peliwo F.[11]
Jones B.
6-37-69
Bertola R.[7]
Nouza P.
6-26-1
Gray A.
Zuk K.[8]
4-67-656-4
Stewart H.
Walters M.
6-26-4
Broom C.[4]
Matusevich A.
6-46-736-3
Moeller M.[1]
Cox D.[10]
6-26-0
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Mchugh A.
6-46-3
Broom C.[9]
Ellis B.
6-46-4
Searle H.
Saville L.[11]
6-47-60
Bolt A.[7]
Tu L.[2]
6-16-2
Fearnley J.
Lajal M.[3]
6-26-4
Pinnington Jones J.
Gill F.[10]
6-26-2
Q1
Moeller M.[1]
Poljak D.
6-47-63
Broom C.[4]
Wendelken H.
6-46-4
Walters M.
Oradini G.[6]
7-56-747-5
Gray A.
Mchugh A.[5]
6-36-2
Cox D.[10]
Barton H.
6-26-3
Jones B.
Diez S.[2]
6-46-4
Peliwo F.[11]
Canter A.
7-626-4
Nouza P.
Gerasimov E.[3]
4-66-36-4
Bertola R.[7]
Houghton G.
6-32-67-5
Matusevich A.
Gomez G.
6-26-1
Stewart H.
Hussey G.[12]
7-56-3
Ellis B.
Sweeny D.[6]
7-636-4
Searle H.
Rodionov J.[1]
6-26-2
Mchugh A.
Mccabe J.[12]
6-726-26-2
Tu L.[2]
Stewart H.
6-17-66
Lajal M.[3]
Brady P.
6-33-66-0
Pinnington Jones J.
Peniston R.[4]
3-67-636-3
Shimabukuro S.[5]
Parker S.
6-16-2
Bolt A.[7]
Mott B.
6-16-4
Fearnley J.
Chidekh C.[8]
2-66-37-64
Broom C.[9]
Wendelken H.
6-46-2
Gill F.[10]
Edmund K.
7-56-4
Saville L.[11]
Hussey G.
7-686-2