Ugo Blanchet vs Jonas Forejtek — Chennai CH Round of 32

Chennai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FRA4
Ugo Blanchet
#174ATP
1521ELO
1546Hard ELO
$119kYTD
$989kCAREER
27 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 February 2024
hard
Jonas Forejtek
CZE
Jonas Forejtek
#312ATP
1387ELO
1333Hard ELO
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Blanchet U.
6-3 3-6 7-6
Forejtek J.
Blanchet U.
63772
Forejtek J.
36651

Ugo Blanchet defeated Jonas Forejtek 6-3 3-6 7-6 in the Chennai CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Ugo Blanchet closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanchet U.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Forejtek J.

Forejtek J.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Blanchet U.

Serve advantage — Forejtek J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanchet U.Forejtek J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (131 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanchet U.Forejtek J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
78
Break points won·Slight edge
15
6
Deciding sets·Slight edge
12
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
93
15

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Blanchet U.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Forejtek J.
3.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
7.5+213 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.5Hard Elo 1333
6.4Overall Elo 1521
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1387
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
2.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
6.2
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.[2]
Nardi L.[1]
6-16-4
Semi-finals
Nardi L.[1]
Tseng C.
6-44-67-66
Nagal S.[2]
Svrcina D.[3]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-56-2
Nagal S.[2]
Palan D.
6-36-3
Nardi L.[1]
Napolitano S.[5]
6-43-66-0
Svrcina D.[3]
Mukund S.
6-766-26-4
R16
Napolitano S.[5]
Added D.
6-26-1
Palan D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-22-66-4
Nagal S.[2]
Fonio G.
7-56-2
Tseng C.
Blanchet U.[4]
6-04-66-2
Nardi L.[1]
Tomic B.
7-56-3
Dalla Valle E.
Roca Batalla O.[6]
6-47-62
Mukund S.
Echargui M.
7-646-3
Svrcina D.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-20-66-2
R32
Added D.
Santillan A.
2-66-44-1
Nardi L.[1]
Vanshelboim E.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Wu T.
3-2
Mukund S.
Kasnikowski M.
6-34-67-5
Palan D.
Weber A.
6-16-4
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Dougaz A.[7]
6-36-3
Dalla Valle E.
Zakharov A.
3-67-626-4
Nagal S.[2]
Dev S.
6-16-2
Svrcina D.[3]
Bobrov B.
6-32-66-2
Tomic B.
Pieczkowski O.
2-66-47-62
Napolitano S.[5]
Uchida K.
6-16-2
Blanchet U.[4]
Forejtek J.
6-33-67-65
Tseng C.
Basilashvili N.
6-46-4
Roca Batalla O.[6]
Ramanathan R.
7-636-2
Echargui M.
Hsu Y.[8]
6-756-27-5
Fonio G.
Janvier M.
6-43-67-5