Yafan Wang vs Anna Karolina Schmiedlova — Hua Hin Round of 16

Hua Hin · WTA · Round of 16
CHN
Yafan Wang
#350WTA
1704ELO
1673Hard ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
SVK8
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova
31 yrs · 176 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
Wang Y.
6-2 6-4
Schmiedlova A.
Wang Y.
662
Schmiedlova A.
240

Yafan Wang defeated Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 6-2 6-4 in the Hua Hin round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Yafan Wang came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Yafan Wang extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-07-01WimbledonR128grassYafan Wang6-0 3-6 6-4
2018-12-31ShenzhenR32hardYafan Wang6-1 6-0
2018-08-27US OpenR128hardYafan Wang6-1 3-6 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Y.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Schmiedlova A.

Schmiedlova A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Y.Schmiedlova A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
63%
61%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
42%
Service points won·Even
57%
54%
Return points won·Even
42%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
51%
Aces / match·Even
2.5
2.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.0
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (63 vs 60). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Y.Schmiedlova A.
Clutch Rating·Even
51
48
Break points saved·Dominant
76
20
Break points won·Clear edge
62
85
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
88
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
55
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Wang Y.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Schmiedlova A.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.5
Minutes 14d
9.4
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Shnaider D.
Zhu L.[2]
6-32-66-1
Semi-finals
Zhu L.[2]
Wang Y.
6-36-2
Shnaider D.
Wang X.[3]
6-27-65
Quarter-finals
Shnaider D.
Galfi D.
6-26-1
Wang Y.
Volynets K.
1-66-37-64
Zhu L.[2]
Rodionova A.
6-36-3
Wang X.[3]
Putintseva Y.[7]
6-13-66-3
R16
Galfi D.
Wang X.[5]
6-43-67-5
Shnaider D.
Badosa P.
6-23-4
Wang X.[3]
Hibino N.
7-56-4
Putintseva Y.[7]
Golubic V.
7-607-61
Wang Y.
Schmiedlova A.[8]
6-26-4
Rodionova A.
Bai Z.
3-66-16-0
Volynets K.
Maria T.[4]
5-76-26-2
Zhu L.[2]
Fruhvirtova L.
6-26-2
R32
Schmiedlova A.[8]
Hontama M.
7-657-68
Rodionova A.
Yuan Y.[6]
7-664-66-3
Wang X.[3]
Bektas E.
5-2
Shnaider D.
Linette M.[1]
6-41-66-1
Badosa P.
Tararudee L.
3-66-46-1
Wang X.[5]
Wang Q.
6-16-1
Hibino N.
Rakhimova K.
7-646-0
Bai Z.
Paquet C.
7-656-3
Zhu L.[2]
Preston T.
6-47-5
Wang Y.
Korneeva A.
6-26-4
Maria T.[4]
Hartono A.
6-36-1
Golubic V.
Pigossi L.
6-16-2
Putintseva Y.[7]
Naklo T.
5-76-36-2
Fruhvirtova L.
Tikhonova A.
6-36-1
Volynets K.
Zidansek T.
6-26-2
Galfi D.
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-0