Noah Rubin vs Matija Pecotic — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
CRO
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Rubin N.
5-7 6-3 7-5
Pecotic M.
Rubin N.
5672
Pecotic M.
7351

Noah Rubin defeated Matija Pecotic 5-7 6-3 7-5 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Matija Pecotic came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rubin N.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Pecotic M.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rubin N.Pecotic M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
56%
52%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
43%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Even
2.3
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (6 vs 10). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rubin N.Pecotic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
49
19
Break points saved·Dominant
80
45
Break points won·Slight edge
31
26
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
40
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rubin N.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Pecotic M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.3
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
8.6
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[5]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
R16
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2