Hazem Naw vs Billy Harris — Koblenz CH Round of 32

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SYR
Hazem Naw
#996ATP
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
Billy Harris
GBR
Billy Harris
#154ATP
1508ELO
1473Hard ELO
$236kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
Naw H.
7-5 7-5
Harris B.
Naw H.
772
Harris B.
550

Hazem Naw defeated Billy Harris 7-5 7-5 in the Koblenz CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Naw H.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Harris B.

Harris B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Naw H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Naw H.Harris B.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (47 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Naw H.
4.2
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Harris B.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
4.8
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.5
3-set count
0.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Naw H.Harris B.
Freshness·
—
96

Harris B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.[1]
Nakashima B.[2]
6-776-16-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Damm M.
3-66-37-67
Rodionov J.[1]
Molleker R.[7]
6-37-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-26-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
R16
Rehberg M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-666-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Krajinovic F.
7-656-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Royer V.
7-646-1
Molleker R.[7]
Blockx A.
6-36-0
Travaglia S.
Marie J.
6-16-1
Damm M.
Kukushkin M.
7-615-77-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Lamasine T.
6-37-63
Naw H.
Otte O.
2-67-636-4
R32
Damm M.
Bellucci M.[6]
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Gentzsch T.
6-06-2
Krajinovic F.
Peniston R.
6-34-66-4
Travaglia S.
Agamenone F.
6-47-5
Otte O.
Harris L.[4]
5-76-16-4
Rehberg M.
Brancaccio R.
6-776-16-2
Nakashima B.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-16-2
Naw H.
Harris B.
7-57-5
Marie J.
Squire H.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-1
Royer V.
Michalski D.
6-736-46-2
Blockx A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
3-66-37-63
Molleker R.[7]
Klizan M.
6-06-2
Kukushkin M.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Kolar Z.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-2
Jorda Sanchis D.
Marchenko I.
6-43-66-1