Tennys Sandgren vs Tim Handel — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA6
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
GER
Tim Handel
#779ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLL
Sandgren T.
6-7 7-5 6-4
Handel T.
Sandgren T.
66762
Handel T.
78541

Tennys Sandgren defeated Tim Handel 6-7 7-5 6-4 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Handel T.

Handel T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Handel T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
50%
45%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
65%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.0
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Handel T.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
3.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
6.1
4.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[5]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
R16
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2