Tennys Sandgren vs Sebastian Fanselow — Cleveland CH Round of 16

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA6
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
GER
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Sandgren T.
6-0 7-6
Fanselow S.
Sandgren T.
6772
Fanselow S.
0640

Tennys Sandgren defeated Sebastian Fanselow 6-0 7-6 in the Cleveland CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving87% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Fanselow S.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Fanselow S.
1st serve in·Even
60%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
58%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Fanselow S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
4
Break points saved·Dominant
92
31
Break points won·Even
2
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
28
22
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Fanselow S.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
5.2
Surface form
6.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.9
Minutes 14d
4.5
4.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[5]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
R16
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2