Mitchell Krueger vs Thomas Fancutt — Cleveland CH Round of 32
Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
Umpiry Score
Pre-match6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limitedForm & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H5.0
8.0
Surface form3.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.9
Minutes 14d7.5
7.0
3-set count8.0
Prev. match8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts5.0
The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.
Krueger M.
672
Fancutt T.
450
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Statistics
Recent form66%1st serve in+8%58%
70%1st serve points won+2%72%
46%2nd serve points won+5%51%
62%Service points won+1%63%
38%Return points won+4%34%
62%Break points saved+2%64%
2.8Aces / match+4.77.5
2Double faults / match+2.14.1
Averages from each player's recent completed matches (20 vs 20). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Draw
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
R16
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2