Stefano Travaglia vs Martin Damm — Koblenz CH Quarter-final

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Stefano Travaglia
ITA
Stefano Travaglia
#150ATP
1570ELO
1539Hard ELO
$175kYTD
$2.8MCAREER
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Travaglia S.
3-6 6-3 7-6
Damm M.
Travaglia S.
36792
Damm M.
63671

Stefano Travaglia defeated Martin Damm 3-6 6-3 7-6 in the Koblenz CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Travaglia S.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Travaglia S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Travaglia S.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
61%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
57%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.3
12.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.0
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (163 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Travaglia S.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
33
26
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
93
Break points won·Dominant
34
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
44
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
10
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Travaglia S.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Damm M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.8Hard Elo 1539
Surface ELO
6.2+118 Hard Elo edge
3.8Overall Elo 1570
ELO gap
6.2Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.6
Surface form
6.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Travaglia S.Damm M.
Freshness·Even
99
97

Travaglia S.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.[1]
Nakashima B.[2]
6-776-16-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Damm M.
3-66-37-67
Rodionov J.[1]
Molleker R.[7]
6-37-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-26-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
R16
Rehberg M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-666-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Krajinovic F.
7-656-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Royer V.
7-646-1
Molleker R.[7]
Blockx A.
6-36-0
Travaglia S.
Marie J.
6-16-1
Damm M.
Kukushkin M.
7-615-77-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Lamasine T.
6-37-63
Naw H.
Otte O.
2-67-636-4
R32
Damm M.
Bellucci M.[6]
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Gentzsch T.
6-06-2
Krajinovic F.
Peniston R.
6-34-66-4
Travaglia S.
Agamenone F.
6-47-5
Otte O.
Harris L.[4]
5-76-16-4
Rehberg M.
Brancaccio R.
6-776-16-2
Nakashima B.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-16-2
Naw H.
Harris B.
7-57-5
Marie J.
Squire H.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-1
Royer V.
Michalski D.
6-736-46-2
Blockx A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
3-66-37-63
Molleker R.[7]
Klizan M.
6-06-2
Kukushkin M.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Kolar Z.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-2
Jorda Sanchis D.
Marchenko I.
6-43-66-1