Martin Damm vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Koblenz CH Round of 16

Koblenz CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#106ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#305ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Damm M.
7-6 5-7 7-6
Kukushkin M.
Damm M.
775772
Kukushkin M.
617631

Martin Damm defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 7-6 5-7 7-6 in the Koblenz CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #106.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.4
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (105 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
46
Break points saved·Even
93
93
Break points won·Dominant
1
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.3+131 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.7Hard Elo 1526
6.4Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
3.6Overall Elo 1552
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
6.6
Surface form
5.1
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
4.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Kukushkin M.
Freshness·
91
—

Damm M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rodionov J.[1]
Nakashima B.[2]
6-776-16-2
Semi-finals
Rodionov J.[1]
Travaglia S.
6-36-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Naw H.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Travaglia S.
Damm M.
3-66-37-67
Rodionov J.[1]
Molleker R.[7]
6-37-5
Naw H.
Kolar Z.[5]
6-26-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Rehberg M.
6-36-4
R16
Rehberg M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
7-666-4
Nakashima B.[2]
Krajinovic F.
7-656-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Royer V.
7-646-1
Molleker R.[7]
Blockx A.
6-36-0
Travaglia S.
Marie J.
6-16-1
Damm M.
Kukushkin M.
7-615-77-63
Kolar Z.[5]
Lamasine T.
6-37-63
Naw H.
Otte O.
2-67-636-4
R32
Damm M.
Bellucci M.[6]
6-36-3
Lamasine T.
Gentzsch T.
6-06-2
Krajinovic F.
Peniston R.
6-34-66-4
Travaglia S.
Agamenone F.
6-47-5
Otte O.
Harris L.[4]
5-76-16-4
Rehberg M.
Brancaccio R.
6-776-16-2
Nakashima B.[2]
Moro Canas A.
6-16-2
Naw H.
Harris B.
7-57-5
Marie J.
Squire H.
6-46-4
Rodionov J.[1]
Novak D.
6-16-1
Royer V.
Michalski D.
6-736-46-2
Blockx A.
Mpetshi Perricard G.
3-66-37-63
Molleker R.[7]
Klizan M.
6-06-2
Kukushkin M.
Janvier M.
6-46-1
Kolar Z.[5]
Broom C.
6-46-2
Jorda Sanchis D.
Marchenko I.
6-43-66-1