Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Nick Chappell — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
USA
Nick Chappell
#1489ATP
33 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWL
Kwiatkowski T.
6-3 6-2
Chappell N.
Kwiatkowski T.
662
Chappell N.
320

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Nick Chappell 6-3 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Nick Chappell came in ranked #1489, defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Chappell N.

Chappell N.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Serve advantage — Kwiatkowski T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Chappell N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.0
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 14). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Chappell N.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
5
0
Break points saved·Dominant
65
29
Break points won·Even
6
8
Deciding sets·Even
1
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
26
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Chappell N.
3.5
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 84 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
6.7
Surface form
2.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
1.0
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[5]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
R16
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2