Arthur Cazaux vs Maximilian Marterer — Montpellier Round of 32

Montpellier · ATP · Round of 32
Arthur Cazaux
FRA
Arthur Cazaux
#78ATP
1793ELO
1738Hard ELO
$46kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
GER
Maximilian Marterer
31 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWW
Cazaux A.
6-1 6-3
Marterer M.
Cazaux A.
662
Marterer M.
130

Arthur Cazaux defeated Maximilian Marterer 6-1 6-3 in the Montpellier round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cazaux A.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Marterer M.

Marterer M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cazaux A.

Serve advantage — Cazaux A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Cazaux A.Marterer M.
40
Serve
—
19
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Cazaux A.Marterer M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.3
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cazaux A.Marterer M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
65
47
Break points saved·Even
97
93
Break points won·Clear edge
27
13
Deciding sets·Clear edge
87
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cazaux A.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Marterer M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
7.6
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.2
Minutes 14d
8.5
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
4.7
Country comfort
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0
5.0
Opponent rise

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
12°CDrizzle
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 86%
Final
Bublik A.[2]
Coric B.[4]
5-76-26-3
Semi-finals
Coric B.[4]
Rune H.[1]
6-34-1
Bublik A.[2]
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
4-66-46-4
Quarter-finals
Bublik A.[2]
Shevchenko A.[6]
4-66-36-4
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Mayot H.
7-56-1
Rune H.[1]
Mmoh M.
7-666-4
Coric B.[4]
Cobolli F.
6-36-4
R16
Rune H.[1]
Llamas Ruiz P.
7-56-2
Cobolli F.
Lestienne C.
6-46-1
Mmoh M.
Muller A.[7]
6-46-4
Coric B.[4]
Martinez P.
6-46-0
Auger Aliassime F.[3]
Cazaux A.
7-52-67-64
Shevchenko A.[6]
Barrere G.
7-632-66-3
Bublik A.[2]
Shapovalov D.
1-67-6126-3
Mayot H.
Paire B.
6-16-4
R32
Llamas Ruiz P.
Gasquet R.
7-667-5
Martinez P.
Munar J.
6-47-63
Barrere G.
Blanchet U.
6-776-46-2
Shapovalov D.
Gaston H.
6-16-3
Lestienne C.
Zapata Miralles B.
4-66-46-2
Mmoh M.
Bonzi B.
6-37-5
Muller A.[7]
Escoffier A.
7-646-3
Cobolli F.
Monfils G.[8]
6-786-36-0
Paire B.
Murray A.[5]
2-67-656-3
Mayot H.
Pouille L.
6-47-5
Shevchenko A.[6]
Svrcina D.
6-44-66-4
Cazaux A.
Marterer M.
6-16-3