Patrick Brady vs Lucas Gerch — Cleveland CH Round of 32

Cleveland CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GBR
Patrick Brady
#838ATP
21 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 January 2024
hard
GER
Lucas Gerch
#941ATP
31 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWWWW
Brady P.
6-3 6-2
Gerch L.
Brady P.
662
Gerch L.
320

Patrick Brady defeated Lucas Gerch 6-3 6-2 in the Cleveland CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brady P.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gerch L.

Gerch L.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Brady P.

Serve advantage — Gerch L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brady P.Gerch L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.3
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 27). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brady P.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Gerch L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
2.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
8.7
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brady P.Gerch L.
Freshness·
82
—

Brady P.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Kypson P.[5]
Quinn E.
4-66-36-2
Semi-finals
Quinn E.
Kudla D.[4]
6-36-4
Kypson P.[5]
Duckworth J.[1]
6-37-61
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Vandecasteele Q.
6-37-5
Quinn E.
Kwiatkowski T.
7-675-76-4
Kypson P.[5]
Nava E.[3]
4-67-616-4
Kudla D.[4]
Sandgren T.[6]
6-45-76-2
R16
Kypson P.[5]
Cassone M.
6-47-64
Sandgren T.[6]
Fanselow S.
6-07-64
Duckworth J.[1]
Maloney P.
6-46-3
Nava E.[3]
Brady P.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-777-5
Kudla D.[4]
Rubin N.
6-16-3
Quinn E.
Kozlov S.
6-24-66-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Trotter J.
6-47-63
R32
Kudla D.[4]
Smith K.
1-66-46-4
Rubin N.
Pecotic M.
5-76-37-5
Kypson P.[5]
Ponwith N.
6-36-2
Vandecasteele Q.
Kuzuhara B.
6-44-67-63
Trotter J.
Svajda Z.[2]
4-66-37-61
Krueger M.[7]
Fancutt T.
6-47-5
Duckworth J.[1]
Kodat T.
6-36-0
Maloney P.
Clark E.
6-26-3
Kozlov S.
Kirchheimer S.
3-66-17-63
Nava E.[3]
Boitan G.
7-646-1
Brady P.
Gerch L.
6-36-2
Cassone M.
Cid R.
6-17-67
Sandgren T.[6]
Handel T.
6-767-56-4
Fanselow S.
Grant W.
7-636-1
Quinn E.
Mayo A.[8]
6-36-3
Kwiatkowski T.
Chappell N.
6-36-2