Matias Soto vs Kyle Kang — Indian Wells 2 CH Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
CHI
Matias Soto
#296ATP
1421ELO
1323Hard ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2024
hard
USA12
Kyle Kang
#695ATP
21 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
Soto M.
7-6 6-3
Kang K.
Soto M.
7862
Kang K.
6630

Matias Soto defeated Kyle Kang 7-6 6-3 in the Indian Wells 2 CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matias Soto closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Soto M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kang K.

Kang K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Soto M.Kang K.
1st serve in·Even
57%
53%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 6). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Soto M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kang K.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.7
Minutes 14d
9.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Soto M.Kang K.
Freshness·
55
—

Soto M.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 77 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
Artnak B.[6]
Clark E.[9]
6-36-4
Soto M.
Fancutt T.[4]
7-57-5
Kuzuhara B.[3]
Kozlov S.
7-666-4
Mckennon M.
Smith K.[8]
6-46-3
Baris O.
Strode E.
6-16-2
Ilagan A.
Angele J.[10]
6-16-1
Q1
Angele J.[10]
Mayo K.
3-66-46-4
Kozlov S.
Ayeni O.[11]
6-46-3
Kuzuhara B.[3]
Leshem E.
7-56-2
Baris O.
Rai A.[7]
6-12-0
Mckennon M.
Goldhoff G.
6-716-26-0
Smith K.[8]
Brumm J.
6-47-5
Strode E.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-46-0
Fancutt T.[4]
Markes C.
6-46-1
Soto M.
Kang K.[12]
7-666-3
Ilagan A.
King D.[5]
6-45-76-2
Artnak B.[6]
Brady P.
6-37-5
Clark E.[9]
Strode I.
6-756-36-2