Brandon Holt vs Ryan Seggerman — Indian Wells 2 CH Round of 32

Indian Wells 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA4
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2024
hard
USA
Ryan Seggerman
#649ATP
26 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLW
Holt B.
6-3 6-4
Seggerman R.
Holt B.
662
Seggerman R.
340

Brandon Holt defeated Ryan Seggerman 6-3 6-4 in the Indian Wells 2 CH round of 32 on hard. Brandon Holt extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-03DallasQ2hardBrandon Holt6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Seggerman R.

Seggerman R.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Seggerman R.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Slight edge
39%
33%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
9.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Seggerman R.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
33
Break points saved·Clear edge
85
70
Break points won·Dominant
31
0
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
74
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Seggerman R.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
6.6
7.04-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
1.1
Minutes 14d
8.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Seggerman R.
Freshness·
—
93

Seggerman R.: 8 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bicknell B.
Svajda Z.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Bicknell B.
Ilagan A.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Bicknell B.
Holt B.[4]
6-32-2
Svajda Z.[1]
Artnak B.
6-23-66-0
Fanselow S.
Tien L.
7-645-76-4
Ilagan A.
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
1-67-656-3
R16
Holt B.[4]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-1
Ilagan A.
Handel T.
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Svajda T.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-1
Artnak B.
Krueger M.[6]
6-26-3
Tien L.
Trungelliti M.[3]
6-26-0
Bicknell B.
Oliel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Artnak B.
Trotter J.
6-37-5
Bicknell B.
Mayo A.[7]
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-46-4
Kuzuhara B.
Pecotic M.
7-650-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Mckennon M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Krueger M.[6]
Kumar O.
7-626-3
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Pospisil V.
6-27-5
Svajda T.
Sandgren T.[5]
0-67-647-63
Oliel Y.
Lock B.
3-67-636-0
Holt B.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Baris O.
7-616-2
Handel T.
Soto M.
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Gaio F.[2]
6-27-5