Tim Handel vs Matias Soto — Indian Wells 2 CH Round of 32

Indian Wells 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
GER
Tim Handel
#779ATP
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2024
hard
CHI
Matias Soto
#249ATP
1421ELO
1323Hard ELO
27 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Handel T.
6-4 6-4
Soto M.
Handel T.
662
Soto M.
440

Tim Handel defeated Matias Soto 6-4 6-4 in the Indian Wells 2 CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Tim Handel edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Handel T.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Soto M.

Soto M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Handel T.

Serve advantage — Soto M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Handel T.Soto M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
58%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (20 vs 109). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Handel T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Soto M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.4
Surface form
5.6
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.9
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Handel T.Soto M.
Freshness·
—
56

Soto M.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 120 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bicknell B.
Svajda Z.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Bicknell B.
Ilagan A.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Bicknell B.
Holt B.[4]
6-32-2
Svajda Z.[1]
Artnak B.
6-23-66-0
Fanselow S.
Tien L.
7-645-76-4
Ilagan A.
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
1-67-656-3
R16
Holt B.[4]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-1
Ilagan A.
Handel T.
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Svajda T.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-1
Artnak B.
Krueger M.[6]
6-26-3
Tien L.
Trungelliti M.[3]
6-26-0
Bicknell B.
Oliel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Artnak B.
Trotter J.
6-37-5
Bicknell B.
Mayo A.[7]
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-46-4
Kuzuhara B.
Pecotic M.
7-650-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Mckennon M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Krueger M.[6]
Kumar O.
7-626-3
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Pospisil V.
6-27-5
Svajda T.
Sandgren T.[5]
0-67-647-63
Oliel Y.
Lock B.
3-67-636-0
Holt B.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Baris O.
7-616-2
Handel T.
Soto M.
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Gaio F.[2]
6-27-5