Marius Copil vs Lloyd Harris — Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve CH Round of 32

Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ROU
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2024
hard
Lloyd Harris
RSA
Lloyd Harris
#187ATP
1665ELO
1640Hard ELO
$130kYTD
$4.7MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLL
Copil M.
7-6 6-7 6-0
Harris L.
Copil M.
776762
Harris L.
647901

Marius Copil defeated Lloyd Harris 7-6 6-7 6-0 in the Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Copil M.serving84% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Harris L.

Harris L.serving92% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Copil M.Harris L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
77%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.9
11.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (17 vs 103). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Copil M.Harris L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
47
57
Break points saved·Even
91
95
Break points won·Clear edge
3
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
63
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Copil M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Harris L.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
5.7
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
1.5
Minutes 14d
6.2
0.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Riedi L.
Coric B.[1]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Coric B.[1]
Dzumhur D.
7-57-65
Riedi L.
Nakashima B.[8]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Riedi L.
Huesler M.
7-667-615
Dzumhur D.
Squire H.
6-47-5
Coric B.[1]
Shelbayh A.
6-27-64
Nakashima B.[8]
Choinski J.
6-16-757-5
R16
Choinski J.
Andreev A.
7-666-1
Riedi L.
Onclin G.
7-56-3
Dzumhur D.
Piros Z.[7]
6-36-4
Coric B.[1]
Majchrzak K.
7-643-66-3
Shelbayh A.
Goffin D.[5]
6-36-4
Squire H.
Copil M.
6-26-2
Huesler M.
Ritschard A.
6-26-1
Nakashima B.[8]
Collignon R.
6-36-2
R32
Dzumhur D.
Kachmazov A.
6-746-31-0
Squire H.
Blockx A.
3-66-47-64
Huesler M.
Rodionov J.[4]
6-26-3
Andreev A.
Bonzi B.[2]
6-44-66-3
Coric B.[1]
Meligeni Alves F.
7-55-76-2
Nakashima B.[8]
Hassan B.
6-36-4
Goffin D.[5]
Bergs Z.
6-756-37-5
Choinski J.
Escoffier A.
6-37-66
Majchrzak K.
Kasnikowski M.
6-44-66-3
Shelbayh A.
Agamenone F.
6-46-3
Copil M.
Harris L.
7-646-776-0
Piros Z.[7]
De Loore J.
6-37-5
Riedi L.
Paire B.[6]
3-66-06-1
Onclin G.
Yevseyev D.
6-46-4
Ritschard A.
Brancaccio R.
6-06-4
Collignon R.
Molleker R.
6-16-1