Blaise Bicknell vs Andre Ilagan — Indian Wells 2 CH Semi-final

Indian Wells 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
JAM
Blaise Bicknell
#354ATP
1313ELO
1290Hard ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 January 2024
hard
USA
Andre Ilagan
#253ATP
1543ELO
1518Hard ELO
25 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWW
Bicknell B.
7-6 6-4
Ilagan A.
Bicknell B.
7762
Ilagan A.
6540

Blaise Bicknell defeated Andre Ilagan 7-6 6-4 in the Indian Wells 2 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bicknell B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ilagan A.

Ilagan A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Bicknell B.

Serve advantage — Ilagan A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bicknell B.Ilagan A.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (69 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bicknell B.Ilagan A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
0
37
Break points saved·Dominant
49
76
Break points won·Clear edge
5
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
71
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
3
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bicknell B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Ilagan A.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
3.4Hard Elo 1290
Surface ELO
6.6+229 Hard Elo edge
3.3Overall Elo 1313
ELO gap
6.7Overall Elo 1543
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bicknell B.Ilagan A.
Freshness·Dominant
99
74

Bicknell B.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Ilagan A.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 80 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Bicknell B.
Svajda Z.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Svajda Z.[1]
Fanselow S.
6-26-4
Bicknell B.
Ilagan A.
7-656-4
Quarter-finals
Bicknell B.
Holt B.[4]
6-32-2
Svajda Z.[1]
Artnak B.
6-23-66-0
Fanselow S.
Tien L.
7-645-76-4
Ilagan A.
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
1-67-656-3
R16
Holt B.[4]
Kuzuhara B.
6-36-1
Ilagan A.
Handel T.
6-46-4
Fanselow S.
Svajda T.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Jubb P.
7-54-66-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Kirchheimer S.
6-26-1
Artnak B.
Krueger M.[6]
6-26-3
Tien L.
Trungelliti M.[3]
6-26-0
Bicknell B.
Oliel Y.
7-56-3
R32
Artnak B.
Trotter J.
6-37-5
Bicknell B.
Mayo A.[7]
6-36-4
Kirchheimer S.
Zhu E.
6-46-4
Kuzuhara B.
Pecotic M.
7-650-66-2
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
Mckennon M.
6-46-3
Svajda Z.[1]
Debru G.
6-46-1
Krueger M.[6]
Kumar O.
7-626-3
Trungelliti M.[3]
Gerch L.
6-26-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-26-3
Fanselow S.
Pospisil V.
6-27-5
Svajda T.
Sandgren T.[5]
0-67-647-63
Oliel Y.
Lock B.
3-67-636-0
Holt B.[4]
Seggerman R.
6-36-4
Jubb P.
Baris O.
7-616-2
Handel T.
Soto M.
6-46-4
Ilagan A.
Gaio F.[2]
6-27-5