Mariano Navone vs Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco — Buenos Aires CH Quarter-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Mariano Navone
ARG1
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
clay
BOL
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
1379ELO
1368Clay ELO
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWWLL
Navone M.
6-2 6-1
Dellien Velasco M.
Navone M.
662
Dellien Velasco M.
210

Mariano Navone defeated Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco 6-2 6-1 in the Buenos Aires CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Mariano Navone came in defending the title.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Navone M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Dellien Velasco M.

Dellien Velasco M.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Navone M.Dellien Velasco M.
0
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Navone M.Dellien Velasco M.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
42%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
1.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (148 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Navone M.Dellien Velasco M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
75
19
Break points saved·Dominant
86
28
Break points won·Dominant
90
19
Deciding sets·Clear edge
77
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Navone M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 70 days (−1.2)
Dellien Velasco M.
3.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
9.9+432 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.1Clay Elo 1368
10.0Overall Elo 1822
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1379
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
9.0
Surface form
4.9
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.2
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Navone M.Dellien Velasco M.
Freshness·
96
—

Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.
Popko D.
6-42-67-64
Bagnis F.[8]
Navone M.[1]
7-51-67-5
Semi-finals
Popko D.
Fonseca J.
6-26-4
Bueno G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-4
Navone M.[1]
Lavagno E.[7]
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.
Houkes M.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Boyer T.[4]
7-666-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Alves M.
6-46-3
Fonseca J.
Mager G.
6-16-3
Navone M.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Popko D.
Collarini A.[4]
6-46-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Draxl L.
6-46-4
R16
Alves M.
Krutykh O.[8]
7-633-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-56-0
Boyer T.[4]
Casanova H.
6-33-66-3
Mager G.
Neumayer L.[1]
3-67-676-4
Fonseca J.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
7-56-4
Popko D.
Stodder T.
7-676-4
Bueno G.
Olivo R.[5]
7-56-2
Houkes M.
Franco Descotte M.
4-66-36-3
Draxl L.
Boyer T.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-35-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Gill F.
3-66-46-4
Collarini A.[4]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
3-66-26-3
Lavagno E.[7]
Weis A.
6-45-77-5
Navone M.[1]
Wenger D.
6-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Bagnis F.[8]
Olivo R.
6-746-46-3
R32
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Draxl L.
1-65-2
Mager G.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
7-666-3
Popko D.
Luz O.
5-76-46-1
Krutykh O.[8]
Villanueva G.
4-67-57-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Lavagno E.[2]
4-66-37-64
Boyer T.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-26-1
Olivo R.[5]
Ambrogi L.
6-36-2
Fonseca J.
Gill F.
2-66-16-2
Casanova H.
Weis A.
6-27-61
Stodder T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[7]
6-27-65
Bueno G.
Barrena A.
6-45-76-3
Houkes M.
Midon L.
7-666-1
Franco Descotte M.
Ficovich J.[3]
6-43-66-1
Alves M.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Taberner C.
6-47-60
Navone M.[1]
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[5]
Torres J.
6-23-66-2
Lavagno E.[7]
Fonseca J.
7-56-4
Boyer T.
Olivieri G.[2]
6-06-1
Olivo R.
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Wenger D.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Draxl L.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-756-36-1
Weis A.
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Luz O.
6-32-66-1
Kicker N.
Mager G.
7-56-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Neumayer L.[6]
1-67-56-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Heide G.
6-756-46-4
Gill F.
Guillen Meza A.
6-26-2
Popko D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-37-67
Collarini A.[4]
Casanova H.
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Stodder T.
6-26-3