Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Marco Trungelliti — Indian Wells 1 CH Quarter-final

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA6
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
Marco Trungelliti
ARG2
Marco Trungelliti
#99ATP
1627ELO
1496Hard ELO
$395kYTD
$2.6MCAREER
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLWLWLWW
Kwiatkowski T.
7-5 6-3
Trungelliti M.
Kwiatkowski T.
762
Trungelliti M.
530

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Marco Trungelliti 7-5 6-3 in the Indian Wells 1 CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marco Trungelliti came in ranked #99.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Trungelliti M.

Trungelliti M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Serve advantage — Trungelliti M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Trungelliti M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
40%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (35 vs 177). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Trungelliti M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
65
87
Break points won·Clear edge
6
24
Deciding sets·Dominant
1
87
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
26
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Trungelliti M.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.5
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kwiatkowski T.Trungelliti M.
Freshness·
—
89

Trungelliti M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 17 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[4]
Holt B.[3]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-25-77-63
Krueger M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[4]
Tien L.
6-47-66
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[2]
7-56-3
Holt B.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-23-66-0
Jubb P.
Kumar O.
6-766-46-1
R16
Holt B.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Kumar O.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-46-2
Krueger M.[4]
Lock B.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Seggerman R.
7-53-67-64
Jubb P.
Kozlov S.
4-66-36-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-27-61
Cukierman D.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Handel T.
6-37-66
R32
Oradini G.
Fanselow S.[8]
6-37-61
Handel T.
Tracy J.
6-36-4
Cukierman D.
Pospisil V.
3-66-16-4
Tien L.
Mckennon M.
6-23-66-0
Krueger M.[4]
Soto M.
6-47-63
Kumar O.
Gaio F.[1]
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Oliel Y.
6-36-1
Kirchheimer S.
Rai A.
6-25-2
Lock B.
Gerch L.
6-36-1
Jubb P.
Brady P.
6-36-0
Kozlov S.
Debru G.[7]
6-13-66-2
Trotter J.
Mayo A.[5]
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-25-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-37-66
Seggerman R.
Zhu E.
7-56-2