Paul Jubb vs Omni Kumar — Indian Wells 1 CH Quarter-final

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
USA
Omni Kumar
24 yrs · 173 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLLWL
Jubb P.
6-7 6-4 6-1
Kumar O.
Jubb P.
66662
Kumar O.
78411

Paul Jubb defeated Omni Kumar 6-7 6-4 6-1 in the Indian Wells 1 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Jubb P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kumar O.

Kumar O.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Serve advantage — Jubb P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jubb P.Kumar O.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Even
4.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (102 vs 21). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jubb P.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kumar O.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.4
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 5
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jubb P.Kumar O.
Freshness·
100
—

Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[4]
Holt B.[3]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-25-77-63
Krueger M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[4]
Tien L.
6-47-66
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[2]
7-56-3
Holt B.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-23-66-0
Jubb P.
Kumar O.
6-766-46-1
R16
Holt B.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Kumar O.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-46-2
Krueger M.[4]
Lock B.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Seggerman R.
7-53-67-64
Jubb P.
Kozlov S.
4-66-36-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-27-61
Cukierman D.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Handel T.
6-37-66
R32
Oradini G.
Fanselow S.[8]
6-37-61
Handel T.
Tracy J.
6-36-4
Cukierman D.
Pospisil V.
3-66-16-4
Tien L.
Mckennon M.
6-23-66-0
Krueger M.[4]
Soto M.
6-47-63
Kumar O.
Gaio F.[1]
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Oliel Y.
6-36-1
Kirchheimer S.
Rai A.
6-25-2
Lock B.
Gerch L.
6-36-1
Jubb P.
Brady P.
6-36-0
Kozlov S.
Debru G.[7]
6-13-66-2
Trotter J.
Mayo A.[5]
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-25-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-37-66
Seggerman R.
Zhu E.
7-56-2