Mitchell Krueger vs Paul Jubb — Indian Wells 1 CH Semi-final

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Mitchell Krueger
USA4
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
GBR
Paul Jubb
#338ATP
1426ELO
1403Hard ELO
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWLW
Krueger M.
6-4 6-4
Jubb P.
Krueger M.
662
Jubb P.
440

Mitchell Krueger defeated Paul Jubb 6-4 6-4 in the Indian Wells 1 CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Mitchell Krueger edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jubb P.

Jubb P.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Jubb P.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.5
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (149 vs 102). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Jubb P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
16
38
Break points saved·Even
87
84
Break points won·Slight edge
14
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Krueger M.
4.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 63 days (−1.2)
Jubb P.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.8+32 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.2Hard Elo 1403
5.8Overall Elo 1461
ELO gap
4.2Overall Elo 1426
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.3
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.9
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Jubb P.
Freshness·Clear edge
87
100

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Jubb P.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[4]
Holt B.[3]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-25-77-63
Krueger M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[4]
Tien L.
6-47-66
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[2]
7-56-3
Holt B.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-23-66-0
Jubb P.
Kumar O.
6-766-46-1
R16
Holt B.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Kumar O.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-46-2
Krueger M.[4]
Lock B.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Seggerman R.
7-53-67-64
Jubb P.
Kozlov S.
4-66-36-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-27-61
Cukierman D.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Handel T.
6-37-66
R32
Oradini G.
Fanselow S.[8]
6-37-61
Handel T.
Tracy J.
6-36-4
Cukierman D.
Pospisil V.
3-66-16-4
Tien L.
Mckennon M.
6-23-66-0
Krueger M.[4]
Soto M.
6-47-63
Kumar O.
Gaio F.[1]
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Oliel Y.
6-36-1
Kirchheimer S.
Rai A.
6-25-2
Lock B.
Gerch L.
6-36-1
Jubb P.
Brady P.
6-36-0
Kozlov S.
Debru G.[7]
6-13-66-2
Trotter J.
Mayo A.[5]
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-25-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-37-66
Seggerman R.
Zhu E.
7-56-2