Tennys Sandgren vs Yu Hsiou Hsu — Nonthaburi 3 CH Round of 32

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Tennys Sandgren
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
Yu Hsiou Hsu
TPE
Yu Hsiou Hsu
#210ATP
1489ELO
1468Hard ELO
27 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Sandgren T.
6-4 7-5
Hsu Y.
Sandgren T.
672
Hsu Y.
450

Tennys Sandgren defeated Yu Hsiou Hsu 6-4 7-5 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tennys Sandgren came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sandgren T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Hsu Y.

Hsu Y.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Sandgren T.

Serve advantage — Sandgren T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sandgren T.Hsu Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
77%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.5
3.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (21 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sandgren T.Hsu Y.
Clutch Rating·Even
36
36
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
74
Break points won·Even
2
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
28
50
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
86
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sandgren T.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hsu Y.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.4
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
6.4
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gigante M.
Hong S.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gigante M.
Jung J.
6-37-5
Hong S.
Fonio G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-4
Hong S.
Novak D.
6-20-0
Gigante M.
Ajdukovic D.[1]
3-66-36-2
Jung J.
Peniston R.
6-46-3
R16
Fonio G.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-06-757-5
Jung J.
Dougaz A.
6-47-64
Novak D.
Oliveira G.
6-46-4
Gigante M.
Onclin G.
6-26-776-2
Peniston R.
Wu T.
6-37-65
Ajdukovic D.[1]
Chanta T.
6-766-46-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Sandgren T.
6-7107-57-62
Hong S.
Hassan B.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Fonio G.
Marie J.
6-24-1
Dougaz A.
Sachko V.[6]
4-1
Chanta T.
Santillan A.
7-644-1
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-36-1
Hong S.
Roca Batalla O.
3-67-656-3
Sandgren T.
Hsu Y.
6-47-5
Gigante M.
Weber A.
1-66-16-2
Oliveira G.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[1]
Travaglia S.
7-54-66-4
Onclin G.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Wu T.
Lajal M.
5-77-56-3
Jung J.
Jones M.
6-26-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Passaro F.
6-37-64
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Bai Y.
6-16-3
Novak D.
Samrej K.
6-16-3
Hassan B.[2]
Harris B.
7-636-1