Matteo Gigante vs Seong Chan Hong — Nonthaburi 3 CH Final

Nonthaburi 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Matteo Gigante
ITA
Matteo Gigante
#526ATP
1592ELO
1534Hard ELO
24 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Gigante M.
6-4 6-1
Hong S.
Gigante M.
662
Hong S.
410

Matteo Gigante defeated Seong Chan Hong 6-4 6-1 in the Nonthaburi 3 CH final on hard. The result followed the form book — Matteo Gigante came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Matteo Gigante extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-05-29Roland GarrosQ1clayMatteo Gigante7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Gigante M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gigante M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gigante M.Hong S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (109 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gigante M.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
52
Break points saved·Even
78
77
Break points won·Slight edge
35
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gigante M.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hong S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.0
Surface form
6.3
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
1.6
7.0
3-set count
0.0
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
8.5

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Gigante M.
Hong S.
6-46-1
Semi-finals
Gigante M.
Jung J.
6-37-5
Hong S.
Fonio G.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Fonio G.
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-46-4
Hong S.
Novak D.
6-20-0
Gigante M.
Ajdukovic D.[1]
3-66-36-2
Jung J.
Peniston R.
6-46-3
R16
Fonio G.
Shimabukuro S.[3]
6-06-757-5
Jung J.
Dougaz A.
6-47-64
Novak D.
Oliveira G.
6-46-4
Gigante M.
Onclin G.
6-26-776-2
Peniston R.
Wu T.
6-37-65
Ajdukovic D.[1]
Chanta T.
6-766-46-0
Moreno De Alboran N.
Sandgren T.
6-7107-57-62
Hong S.
Hassan B.[2]
6-26-3
R32
Fonio G.
Marie J.
6-24-1
Dougaz A.
Sachko V.[6]
4-1
Chanta T.
Santillan A.
7-644-1
Peniston R.
Brouwer G.[4]
6-36-1
Hong S.
Roca Batalla O.
3-67-656-3
Sandgren T.
Hsu Y.
6-47-5
Gigante M.
Weber A.
1-66-16-2
Oliveira G.
Bellucci M.[8]
6-46-2
Ajdukovic D.[1]
Travaglia S.
7-54-66-4
Onclin G.
Tabur C.
6-46-3
Wu T.
Lajal M.
5-77-56-3
Jung J.
Jones M.
6-26-1
Moreno De Alboran N.
Passaro F.
6-37-64
Shimabukuro S.[3]
Bai Y.
6-16-3
Novak D.
Samrej K.
6-16-3
Hassan B.[2]
Harris B.
7-636-1