Liam Draxl vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Buenos Aires CH Round of 32

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Liam Draxl
CAN
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1499Clay ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Draxl L.
6-7 6-3 6-1
Reis Da Silva J.
Draxl L.
65662
Reis Da Silva J.
77311

Liam Draxl defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-7 6-3 6-1 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Liam Draxl came in ranked #223, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Liam Draxl extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-06Davis Cup QLS R1: BRA vs CANRRhardLiam Draxl6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Draxl L.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Draxl L.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.9
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Draxl L.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
66
12
Break points saved·Dominant
83
49
Break points won·Slight edge
36
43
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
75
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Draxl L.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Reis Da Silva J.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.5+29 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.5Clay Elo 1470
6.5Overall Elo 1592
ELO gap
3.5Overall Elo 1486
5.0
H2H
5.0
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.2
Minutes 14d
5.8
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Draxl L.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
98
—

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.
Popko D.
6-42-67-64
Bagnis F.[8]
Navone M.[1]
7-51-67-5
Semi-finals
Popko D.
Fonseca J.
6-26-4
Bueno G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-4
Navone M.[1]
Lavagno E.[7]
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.
Houkes M.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Boyer T.[4]
7-666-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Alves M.
6-46-3
Fonseca J.
Mager G.
6-16-3
Navone M.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Popko D.
Collarini A.[4]
6-46-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Draxl L.
6-46-4
R16
Alves M.
Krutykh O.[8]
7-633-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-56-0
Boyer T.[4]
Casanova H.
6-33-66-3
Mager G.
Neumayer L.[1]
3-67-676-4
Fonseca J.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
7-56-4
Popko D.
Stodder T.
7-676-4
Bueno G.
Olivo R.[5]
7-56-2
Houkes M.
Franco Descotte M.
4-66-36-3
Draxl L.
Boyer T.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-35-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Gill F.
3-66-46-4
Collarini A.[4]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
3-66-26-3
Lavagno E.[7]
Weis A.
6-45-77-5
Navone M.[1]
Wenger D.
6-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Bagnis F.[8]
Olivo R.
6-746-46-3
R32
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Draxl L.
1-65-2
Mager G.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
7-666-3
Popko D.
Luz O.
5-76-46-1
Krutykh O.[8]
Villanueva G.
4-67-57-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Lavagno E.[2]
4-66-37-64
Boyer T.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-26-1
Olivo R.[5]
Ambrogi L.
6-36-2
Fonseca J.
Gill F.
2-66-16-2
Casanova H.
Weis A.
6-27-61
Stodder T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[7]
6-27-65
Bueno G.
Barrena A.
6-45-76-3
Houkes M.
Midon L.
7-666-1
Franco Descotte M.
Ficovich J.[3]
6-43-66-1
Alves M.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Taberner C.
6-47-60
Navone M.[1]
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[5]
Torres J.
6-23-66-2
Lavagno E.[7]
Fonseca J.
7-56-4
Boyer T.
Olivieri G.[2]
6-06-1
Olivo R.
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Wenger D.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Draxl L.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-756-36-1
Weis A.
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Luz O.
6-32-66-1
Kicker N.
Mager G.
7-56-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Neumayer L.[6]
1-67-56-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Heide G.
6-756-46-4
Gill F.
Guillen Meza A.
6-26-2
Popko D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-37-67
Collarini A.[4]
Casanova H.
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Stodder T.
6-26-3