Mikhail Kukushkin vs Martin Damm — Tenerife CH Round of 32

Tenerife CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1657Hard ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Kukushkin M.
6-4 7-6
Damm M.
Kukushkin M.
6772
Damm M.
4620

Mikhail Kukushkin defeated Martin Damm 6-4 7-6 in the Tenerife CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kukushkin M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kukushkin M.Damm M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
78%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.9
12.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kukushkin M.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
46
26
Break points saved·Even
93
93
Break points won·Dominant
41
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
41
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
44
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kukushkin M.
3.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Damm M.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.7Hard Elo 1526
Surface ELO
6.3+131 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1552
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
7.3
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
4.8
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kukushkin M.Damm M.
Freshness·
—
97

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[4]
Martinez P.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-2
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Maestrelli F.
6-47-65
Yevseyev D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-647-65
Barranco Cosano J.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
6-36-756-3
Martinez P.[2]
Berankis R.
6-26-2
Yevseyev D.
Fognini F.[1]
6-31-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Den Ouden G.
6-06-756-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Moro Canas A.
6-36-1
Maestrelli F.
Virtanen O.[7]
6-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
Andreev A.
6-16-4
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Brancaccio R.
7-643-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Landaluce M.
6-22-67-61
Martinez P.[2]
Geerts M.
7-637-65
Virtanen O.[7]
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Yevseyev D.
Riedi L.
6-44-1
Berankis R.
Agamenone F.
6-26-2
Moro Canas A.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-637-5
Maestrelli F.
Rincon D.
6-36-4
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-36-2
Den Ouden G.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-36-3
Fognini F.[1]
Martineau M.
6-776-36-1
Andreev A.
Royer V.
6-16-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Damm M.
6-47-62
Blancaneaux G.
Paire B.[3]
6-35-76-2
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4