Daniel Cukierman vs James Trotter — Indian Wells 1 CH Round of 16

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
ISR
Daniel Cukierman
#1338ATP
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
JPN
James Trotter
#432ATP
1414ELO
1380Hard ELO
26 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLLWLW
Cukierman D.
6-4 6-4
Trotter J.
Cukierman D.
662
Trotter J.
440

Daniel Cukierman defeated James Trotter 6-4 6-4 in the Indian Wells 1 CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Daniel Cukierman edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cukierman D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Trotter J.

Trotter J.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Cukierman D.

Serve advantage — Trotter J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cukierman D.Trotter J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
66%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
35%
Break points saved·Clear edge
51%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
8.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.5
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 134). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cukierman D.Trotter J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
3
41
Break points saved·Dominant
12
90
Break points won·Dominant
47
2
Deciding sets·Dominant
12
82
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
31
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Cukierman D.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Trotter J.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.3
Surface form
6.8
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Cukierman D.Trotter J.
Freshness·
—
61

Trotter J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 85 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[4]
Holt B.[3]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-25-77-63
Krueger M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[4]
Tien L.
6-47-66
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[2]
7-56-3
Holt B.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-23-66-0
Jubb P.
Kumar O.
6-766-46-1
R16
Holt B.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Kumar O.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-46-2
Krueger M.[4]
Lock B.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Seggerman R.
7-53-67-64
Jubb P.
Kozlov S.
4-66-36-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-27-61
Cukierman D.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Handel T.
6-37-66
R32
Oradini G.
Fanselow S.[8]
6-37-61
Handel T.
Tracy J.
6-36-4
Cukierman D.
Pospisil V.
3-66-16-4
Tien L.
Mckennon M.
6-23-66-0
Krueger M.[4]
Soto M.
6-47-63
Kumar O.
Gaio F.[1]
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Oliel Y.
6-36-1
Kirchheimer S.
Rai A.
6-25-2
Lock B.
Gerch L.
6-36-1
Jubb P.
Brady P.
6-36-0
Kozlov S.
Debru G.[7]
6-13-66-2
Trotter J.
Mayo A.[5]
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-25-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-37-66
Seggerman R.
Zhu E.
7-56-2