Brandon Holt vs Daniel Cukierman — Indian Wells 1 CH Quarter-final

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
USA3
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
ISR
Daniel Cukierman
#1338ATP
31 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
Holt B.
6-2 3-6 6-0
Cukierman D.
Holt B.
6362
Cukierman D.
2601

Brandon Holt defeated Daniel Cukierman 6-2 3-6 6-0 in the Indian Wells 1 CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Cukierman D.

Cukierman D.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Serve advantage — Holt B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Cukierman D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
59%
Return points won·Even
39%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
51%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
0.9
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (143 vs 51). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Cukierman D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
58
3
Break points saved·Dominant
85
12
Break points won·Clear edge
31
47
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Holt B.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Cukierman D.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 77 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.4
Surface form
6.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
4.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Krueger M.[4]
Holt B.[3]
4-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Holt B.[3]
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
6-25-77-63
Krueger M.[4]
Jubb P.
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Krueger M.[4]
Tien L.
6-47-66
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Trungelliti M.[2]
7-56-3
Holt B.[3]
Cukierman D.
6-23-66-0
Jubb P.
Kumar O.
6-766-46-1
R16
Holt B.[3]
Kirchheimer S.
6-36-3
Kumar O.
Basavareddy N.
4-66-46-2
Krueger M.[4]
Lock B.
6-46-4
Trungelliti M.[2]
Seggerman R.
7-53-67-64
Jubb P.
Kozlov S.
4-66-36-3
Tien L.
Oradini G.
6-27-61
Cukierman D.
Trotter J.
6-46-4
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Handel T.
6-37-66
R32
Oradini G.
Fanselow S.[8]
6-37-61
Handel T.
Tracy J.
6-36-4
Cukierman D.
Pospisil V.
3-66-16-4
Tien L.
Mckennon M.
6-23-66-0
Krueger M.[4]
Soto M.
6-47-63
Kumar O.
Gaio F.[1]
6-36-2
Basavareddy N.
Cassone M.
6-26-2
Trungelliti M.[2]
Oliel Y.
6-36-1
Kirchheimer S.
Rai A.
6-25-2
Lock B.
Gerch L.
6-36-1
Jubb P.
Brady P.
6-36-0
Kozlov S.
Debru G.[7]
6-13-66-2
Trotter J.
Mayo A.[5]
7-656-2
Holt B.[3]
Bicknell B.
6-25-76-2
Kwiatkowski T.[6]
Kuzuhara B.
6-37-66
Seggerman R.
Zhu E.
7-56-2