Javier Barranco Cosano vs Mikhail Kukushkin — Tenerife CH Quarter-final

Tenerife CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
ESP
Javier Barranco Cosano
#433ATP
1457ELO
1399Hard ELO
27 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
Mikhail Kukushkin
KAZ
Mikhail Kukushkin
#316ATP
1552ELO
1526Hard ELO
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLWL
Barranco Cosano J.
6-1 6-1
Kukushkin M.
Barranco Cosano J.
662
Kukushkin M.
110

Javier Barranco Cosano defeated Mikhail Kukushkin 6-1 6-1 in the Tenerife CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Barranco Cosano J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kukushkin M.

Kukushkin M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Barranco Cosano J.

Serve advantage — Kukushkin M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Barranco Cosano J.Kukushkin M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
58%
63%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.1
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 164). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Barranco Cosano J.Kukushkin M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
14
46
Break points saved·Clear edge
70
93
Break points won·Slight edge
33
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
5
41
Tiebreaks·Dominant
7
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Barranco Cosano J.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Kukushkin M.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
3.3Hard Elo 1399
Surface ELO
6.7+127 Hard Elo edge
3.6Overall Elo 1457
ELO gap
6.4Overall Elo 1552
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.2
Surface form
4.4
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Nakashima B.[4]
Martinez P.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-16-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Yevseyev D.
7-666-2
Quarter-finals
Martinez P.[2]
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
6-46-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Maestrelli F.
6-47-65
Yevseyev D.
Vincent Ruggeri S.
6-36-4
Barranco Cosano J.
Kukushkin M.
6-16-1
R16
Kukushkin M.
Blancaneaux G.
7-647-65
Barranco Cosano J.
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
6-36-756-3
Martinez P.[2]
Berankis R.
6-26-2
Yevseyev D.
Fognini F.[1]
6-31-66-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Den Ouden G.
6-06-756-2
Nakashima B.[4]
Moro Canas A.
6-36-1
Maestrelli F.
Virtanen O.[7]
6-46-1
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
Andreev A.
6-16-4
R32
Barranco Cosano J.
Brancaccio R.
7-643-1
Nakashima B.[4]
Landaluce M.
6-22-67-61
Martinez P.[2]
Geerts M.
7-637-65
Virtanen O.[7]
Shelbayh A.
6-47-66
Yevseyev D.
Riedi L.
6-44-1
Berankis R.
Agamenone F.
6-26-2
Moro Canas A.
Martin Tiffon P.
7-637-5
Maestrelli F.
Rincon D.
6-36-4
Meligeni Alves F.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
3-66-36-2
Den Ouden G.
Escoffier A.[8]
6-36-3
Fognini F.[1]
Martineau M.
6-776-36-1
Andreev A.
Royer V.
6-16-1
Vincent Ruggeri S.
Janvier M.
6-36-3
Kukushkin M.
Damm M.
6-47-62
Blancaneaux G.
Paire B.[3]
6-35-76-2
Llamas Ruiz P.[6]
Kachmazov A.
7-656-4