Patrick Brady vs Nathan Ponwith — Indian Wells 1 CH Qualifying Round 1

Indian Wells 1 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
GBR
Patrick Brady
#838ATP
21 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
hard
USA1
Nathan Ponwith
#1273ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLWWL
Brady P.
1-6 6-3 7-5
Ponwith N.
Brady P.
1672
Ponwith N.
6351

Patrick Brady defeated Nathan Ponwith 1-6 6-3 7-5 in the Indian Wells 1 CH qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Brady P.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Ponwith N.

Ponwith N.serving77% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Brady P.

Serve advantage — Brady P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Brady P.Ponwith N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
69%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
54%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
34%
Break points saved·Even
57%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Brady P.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 63 days (−1.2)
Ponwith N.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 49 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.6
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Brady P.Ponwith N.
Freshness·
82
—

Brady P.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 57 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Soto M.
Vandecasteele Q.[11]
6-44-66-4
Rai A.[4]
Smith K.[8]
6-30-67-5
Brady P.
Aguilar J.
4-60-0
Tracy J.
Rubin N.
6-756-44-2
Kozlov S.
Leshem E.
7-56-3
Mckennon M.
Godsick N.
4-66-36-2
Q1
Vandecasteele Q.[11]
Brumm J.
6-26-2
Brady P.
Ponwith N.[1]
1-66-37-5
Tracy J.
King D.[3]
7-56-1
Smith K.[8]
Bullard J.
6-46-2
Mckennon M.
Ilagan A.[12]
6-26-3
Soto M.
Fancutt T.[2]
6-36-1
Kozlov S.
Clark E.[9]
2-67-676-4
Godsick N.
Artnak B.[6]
4-66-47-5
Aguilar J.
Vives Marcos P.[7]
4-63-0
Rubin N.
Kang K.[10]
6-36-2
Rai A.[4]
Strode E.
6-26-3
Leshem E.
Lama G.[5]
6-16-1