Facundo Bagnis vs Mariano Navone — Buenos Aires CH Final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Final
ARG8
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 January 2024
clay
Mariano Navone
ARG1
Mariano Navone
#48ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Bagnis F.
7-5 1-6 7-5
Navone M.
Bagnis F.
7172
Navone M.
5651

Facundo Bagnis defeated Mariano Navone 7-5 1-6 7-5 in the Buenos Aires CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #48, defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 7–5 1–6 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Navone M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Bagnis F.Navone M.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Navone M.
1st serve in·Even
64%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (73 vs 148). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Navone M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
75
Break points saved·Slight edge
92
86
Break points won·Dominant
35
90
Deciding sets·Clear edge
89
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bagnis F.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 56 days (−0.7)
Navone M.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 70 days (−1.2)
Form & Matchup
2.8Clay Elo 1584
Surface ELO
7.2+216 Clay Elo edge
2.7Overall Elo 1591
ELO gap
7.3Overall Elo 1822
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
4.8
Surface form
9.0
0.0
Win streak
7.03-match win streak
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Navone M.
Freshness·
—
96

Navone M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bueno G.
Popko D.
6-42-67-64
Bagnis F.[8]
Navone M.[1]
7-51-67-5
Semi-finals
Popko D.
Fonseca J.
6-26-4
Bueno G.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-46-4
Navone M.[1]
Lavagno E.[7]
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Popko D.
6-47-5
Quarter-finals
Bueno G.
Houkes M.
6-16-4
Popko D.
Boyer T.[4]
7-666-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Alves M.
6-46-3
Fonseca J.
Mager G.
6-16-3
Navone M.[1]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-1
Lavagno E.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
4-66-36-2
Popko D.
Collarini A.[4]
6-46-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Draxl L.
6-46-4
R16
Alves M.
Krutykh O.[8]
7-633-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Sakamoto P.
7-56-0
Boyer T.[4]
Casanova H.
6-33-66-3
Mager G.
Neumayer L.[1]
3-67-676-4
Fonseca J.
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
7-56-4
Popko D.
Stodder T.
7-676-4
Bueno G.
Olivo R.[5]
7-56-2
Houkes M.
Franco Descotte M.
4-66-36-3
Draxl L.
Boyer T.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Kovalik J.[5]
6-35-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Gill F.
3-66-46-4
Collarini A.[4]
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
3-66-26-3
Lavagno E.[7]
Weis A.
6-45-77-5
Navone M.[1]
Wenger D.
6-36-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Bagnis F.[8]
Olivo R.
6-746-46-3
R32
Dellien Velasco M.[6]
Draxl L.
1-65-2
Mager G.
Guillen Meza A.
6-46-4
Neumayer L.[1]
Sanchez Jover C.
7-666-3
Popko D.
Luz O.
5-76-46-1
Krutykh O.[8]
Villanueva G.
4-67-57-62
Reis Da Silva J.
Lavagno E.[2]
4-66-37-64
Boyer T.[4]
Torres J.
3-66-26-1
Olivo R.[5]
Ambrogi L.
6-36-2
Fonseca J.
Gill F.
2-66-16-2
Casanova H.
Weis A.
6-27-61
Stodder T.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.[7]
6-27-65
Bueno G.
Barrena A.
6-45-76-3
Houkes M.
Midon L.
7-666-1
Franco Descotte M.
Ficovich J.[3]
6-43-66-1
Alves M.
Aboian V.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Taberner C.
6-47-60
Navone M.[1]
Bueno G.
6-36-2
Kovalik J.[5]
Torres J.
6-23-66-2
Lavagno E.[7]
Fonseca J.
7-56-4
Boyer T.
Olivieri G.[2]
6-06-1
Olivo R.
Ficovich J.
6-46-3
Wenger D.
Villanueva G.
7-656-4
Draxl L.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-756-36-1
Weis A.
Krutykh O.
6-36-3
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
Luz O.
6-32-66-1
Kicker N.
Mager G.
7-56-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Neumayer L.[6]
1-67-56-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Heide G.
6-756-46-4
Gill F.
Guillen Meza A.
6-26-2
Popko D.
Sanchez Jover C.
6-37-67
Collarini A.[4]
Casanova H.
6-06-4
Bagnis F.[8]
Stodder T.
6-26-3