Sebastian Fanselow vs Tristan Lamasine — Oeiras 2 CH Qualifying Round 2

Oeiras 2 CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
GER8
Sebastian Fanselow
#1187ATP
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 January 2024
hard
FRA5
Tristan Lamasine
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLWWLL
Fanselow S.
6-4 6-4
Lamasine T.
Fanselow S.
662
Lamasine T.
440

Sebastian Fanselow defeated Tristan Lamasine 6-4 6-4 in the Oeiras 2 CH qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sebastian Fanselow came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Sebastian Fanselow edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fanselow S.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lamasine T.

Lamasine T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Fanselow S.

Serve advantage — Lamasine T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fanselow S.Lamasine T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
56%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
56%
54%
Aces / match·Even
2.9
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fanselow S.Lamasine T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
4
21
Break points saved·Slight edge
31
38
Break points won·Clear edge
5
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
22
51
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
51
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Fanselow S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Lamasine T.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.1
Surface form
7.6
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.5
7.0
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Q2
Vincent Ruggeri S.[11]
Added D.[3]
6-46-2
Moller E.
Erhard M.[10]
6-07-5
Copil M.[7]
Moeller M.[1]
6-46-3
Vrbensky M.[2]
Gautier A.
6-35-77-64
Mchugh A.[12]
Celikbilek A.[4]
6-13-66-4
Fanselow S.[8]
Lamasine T.[5]
6-46-4
Q1
Gautier A.
Den Ouden G.
6-46-726-3
Vincent Ruggeri S.[11]
Friberg K.
6-36-2
Lamasine T.[5]
Simoes M.
6-36-2
Moller E.
Kodat T.[6]
2-66-46-1
Fanselow S.[8]
Gerasimov E.
7-6106-4
Erhard M.[10]
Rocha F.
6-43-66-3
Moeller M.[1]
Barroso Campos A.
6-26-2
Copil M.[7]
Gerch L.
6-26-4
Vrbensky M.[2]
Barranco Cosano J.
7-632-66-1
Added D.[3]
Araujo P.
6-26-4
Celikbilek A.[4]
Ejupovic E.
6-36-4
Mchugh A.[12]
Fernandes R.
6-06-4